Who's surprised?

If Bushco won't release military records or gubnatorial docs, why on earth would we expect them to release a Pentagon memo of this importance? I was going to link to the Daily Misleader's story on this but can't find it on their website. In all honesty, I wouldn't be surprised if Bush was walking around hi-fiving people about his decision to 'show 'em who's boss' or some other such nonsense. Here's the text of the email:
======================================================================
BUSH CHANGING HIS STORY ON PRISON ABUSE SCANDAL

President Bush has claimed that the prison abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib was "disgraceful conduct by a few American troops,"[1] and had nothing to do with broader administration policy. But according to a March 2003 Pentagon memo, Bush administration lawyers issued legal justifications for torture, specifically claiming, "President Bush was not bound by either an international treaty prohibiting torture or by a federal anti-torture law."[2] The revelations have now forced the President to backtrack from his previous denials of culpability, with the White House yesterday admitting for the first time that Bush did, in fact, "set broad guidelines"[3] for interrogation in Iraq - a tacit admission that Bush himself "opened the door"[4] to the torture tactics in the first place.

Now, the U.S. Senate is demanding the full Pentagon memo from the Bush administration. But the President has refused, instead dispatching Attorney General John Ashcroft to tell "lawmakers he won't release or discuss"[5] the memo, even if he is cited for contempt of Congress. This is the same Ashcroft who "conveniently declassified"[6] internal Justice Department memos in an effort to slander 9/11 commissioner Jamie Gorelick. It is also the same Bush administration that leaked the classified name of a CIA officer[7] in an effort to intimidate a former ambassador who had debunked their false WMD claims.[8]

Sources:

1. Presidential Speech, White House Website, 5/24/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1155990&l=39670.
2. "Lawyers Decided Bans on Torture Didn't Bind Bush", The New York Times,
6/08/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1155990&l=39671.
3. "Memo on Torture Draws Focus to Bush", The Washington Post, 6/09/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1155990&l=39672.
4. "The Roots of Torture", Newsweek, 5/24/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1155990&l=39673.
5. "U.S.'s Ashcroft Won't Release or Discuss Torture Memo (Update 2)",
Bloomberg.com, 6/08/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1155990&l=39674.
6. "Mr. Ashcroft's Smear", The Washington Post, 4/20/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1155990&l=39675.
7. "Mission to Niger", townhall.com, 7/14/03,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1155990&l=39676.
8. "White House "warned over Iraq claim", BBC News, 7/09/03,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1155990&l=39677.
========================================================